Weekly Trading Signal Results: 94% Average Accuracy by Points, +168,166 Net Points

The record at a glance: 32 published weeks

These are the real, published weekly trading signal results behind this site — the same numbers, week by week, that appear on the performance page. From 25 August 2025 to 31 July 2026 the service published 32 weekly reports covering gold, forex, oil, indices and crypto signals, every one with entry, take profit and stop loss.

The measure that matters in any results claim is not the best week but the whole ledger — winners, losers and the average across time. Weekly accuracy across the record ranged from 86.7% at the bottom to two perfect 100% weeks at the top, and every reported week closed with positive net points. That consistency, rather than any single headline number, is what the rest of this page unpacks. Here is the whole ledger:

What 'accuracy by points' means — and why we measure it that way

Most signal channels quote a win rate by trade count: ten wins out of twelve trades reads as 83%. The problem is that trade-count win rates are trivially easy to game — bank ten tiny winners of 20 points each, take two 300-point losses, and you can boast an 83% win rate on a week that actually lost money.

Accuracy by points closes that loophole. Each week we compare the points won against the points lost across all closed signals: a 94% weekly figure means the points banked by winners represented 94% of the total points moved that week. It weights every trade by its actual size, so small winners cannot paper over large losses. It is the same standard applied across every guide on this site, including the best trading signals pillar — and it is why the headline number and the net-points number always travel together.

A worked example from the record: the week of 8–12 June 2026 logged 33 winning trades against 4 losses and one break-even. By trade count that is a 89% win rate; by points it came out at 89.5%, because the losses were held small relative to the winners. When the two measures agree, risk is being managed; when a provider's win rate is high but they refuse to show net points, something is being hidden.

Month by month: how the +168,166 points accumulated

A single hot streak proves nothing — consistency across months is the real test. Here is the record aggregated by month, computed from the same weekly reports (months with reporting gaps show fewer weeks; gaps are gaps, and we show them rather than backfill them):

Two patterns stand out. First, no reported month closed negative — the leanest full month still added points. Second, the strongest stretches came in bursts: January and February 2026 together contributed more than +43,500 points as gold trended hard through US rate repricing, and June 2026 added +22,575 across four consecutive reported weeks. Trend-rich months flatter any signal service; the December and April figures are the more sober baseline to anchor expectations on.

The latest week: 17–21 August 2026

The most recent report closed the week of 17 to 21 August 2026 at +4,350 net points with 91.4% accuracy by points — 36 signals: 27 wins, 4 losses and 5 break-even. Below our 94% average, and published exactly as it closed.

Gold carried the week again: 11 trades for +1,800 net, including a single +950 run, but also three of the week's four losses. The S&P 500 added +950 across two signals and US oil +820 across three.