Skip to content
Get the signals freeSee the verified track record
Best Trading Signalbesttradingsignal.com
trading signal results

Weekly Trading Signal Results: 93% Average Accuracy by Points, +203,676 Net Points

Real weekly trading signal results: 93% average accuracy by points and +203,676 net points across 38 published weeks. See every week's numbers, start free.

At a glance

Best Trading Signal publishes its full weekly record: 93% average weekly accuracy by points and +203,676 net points across 38 published weeks from August 2025 to October 2026, spanning gold, forex, oil, indices and crypto — losing weeks included. Get the same signals free with a $400 XS deposit that stays your capital, or subscribe via our Telegram bot.

  • +203,676 net points over 38 published weeks (August 2025 – October 2026) at a 93% average weekly accuracy by points
  • Best week on record: +15,960 points at 97.5% accuracy (2–6 Feb 2026); two perfect 100% weeks (Sep 2025, Apr 2026)
  • Weakest weeks published too — 86.7% and 87.5% weeks sit in the open record, no cherry-picking
  • Accuracy is measured by points, not trade count — a harder number to game, explained below
  • Every week verifiable on the performance page — get the signals free via a $400 XS deposit or via the Telegram bot

The record at a glance: 38 published weeks

These are the real, published weekly trading signal results behind this site — the same numbers, week by week, that appear on the performance page. From 25 August 2025 to 2 October 2026 the service published 38 weekly reports covering gold, forex, oil, indices and crypto signals, every one with entry, take profit and stop loss.

The measure that matters in any results claim is not the best week but the whole ledger — winners, losers and the average across time. Weekly accuracy across the record ranged from 86.7% at the bottom to two perfect 100% weeks at the top, and every reported week closed with positive net points. That consistency, rather than any single headline number, is what the rest of this page unpacks. Here is the whole ledger:

The full record in four numbers

The full record in four numbers
MetricResult
Published weeks29 (Aug 2025 – Oct 2026)
Average weekly accuracy (by points)93%
Total net points+203,676
Range of weekly accuracy86.7% (weakest) to 100% (two perfect weeks)

What 'accuracy by points' means — and why we measure it that way

Most signal channels quote a win rate by trade count: ten wins out of twelve trades reads as 83%. The problem is that trade-count win rates are trivially easy to game — bank ten tiny winners of 20 points each, take two 300-point losses, and you can boast an 83% win rate on a week that actually lost money.

Accuracy by points closes that loophole. Each week we compare the points won against the points lost across all closed signals: a 93% weekly figure means the points banked by winners represented 93% of the total points moved that week. It weights every trade by its actual size, so small winners cannot paper over large losses. It is the same standard applied across every guide on this site, including the best trading signals pillar — and it is why the headline number and the net-points number always travel together.

A worked example from the record: the week of 8–12 June 2026 logged 33 winning trades against 4 losses and one break-even. By trade count that is a 89% win rate; by points it came out at 89.5%, because the losses were held small relative to the winners. When the two measures agree, risk is being managed; when a provider's win rate is high but they refuse to show net points, something is being hidden.

The latest week: 28 September – 2 October 2026

The most recent report closed the week of 28 September to 2 October 2026 at +5,785 net points with 91.17% accuracy by points — 36 signals: 28 wins, 5 losses and 3 break-even. Just under our 93% average, and published exactly as it closed.

Gold carried the week — 15 trades for +2,845 net, including runs of +630 and +550, but also four of the week's five losses. US oil added +1,050 from three winning signals and the S&P 500 +850 from three. Forex was steady rather than spectacular: 12 signals across nine pairs for +670 net, with a single loss on EUR/USD.

Week of 28 September – 2 October 2026, by instrument

Week of 28 September – 2 October 2026, by instrument
InstrumentSignalsNet points
XAU/USD15+2,845
US oil3+1,050
S&P 5003+850
DAX3+370
CHF/JPY2+200
EUR/JPY2+170
USD/JPY2+100
AUD/USD1+70
GBP/USD1+60
GBP/JPY1+50
NZD/USD1+50
USD/CHF1+40
EUR/USD1−70
Total36+5,785

Ready to get started?

Save up to US$2,500 a year

Get the signals free

Open a trading account with XS through our link and deposit US$400 — the capital stays in your account, yours to trade — and you unlock full signals access free, replacing a subscription worth around US$2,500 a year.

  1. 1Open an XS account through our link
  2. 2Deposit US$400 — the capital stays yours to trade
  3. 3Send your proof on Telegram and every signal is free
Open an XS account
Rather just subscribe?

No broker account needed — subscribe through our Telegram bot and get every signal with a clear entry, take-profit and stop-loss, straight to your phone.

Subscribe on Telegram

Our trading signals are a separate service run by Best Trading Signal. They are not provided or endorsed by any broker; free access with an XS deposit is our own offer.

Trading forex and CFDs carries a real risk of losing money. Our signals are general market analysis, not personal financial advice.

What would that mean in dollars? (Lot-size illustration)

Latest week (28 Sep – 2 Oct 2026): +5,785 net points at 91.17% — 36 signals, 28 wins, 5 losses, 3 break-even

For Australian context: the 0.01-lot figure is roughly A$840 for the week on a micro-lot account — the sizing we would actually suggest for anyone starting with the free-path $400 deposit. Resist the urge to read the standard-lot row as a target: sizing must follow your account balance and the 1–2% risk rule, not the other way around, and a losing week at oversized lots does far more damage than a winning week at sensible ones repairs.

Latest published week (+2,770 points) converted by lot size — historical estimate

Latest published week (+2,770 points) converted by lot size — historical estimate
Lot sizeIndicative point valueEstimated week result
0.01 lot (micro)≈ $0.10 / point≈ $277 (≈ A$423)
0.10 lot (mini)≈ $1.00 / point≈ $2,770
1.00 lot (standard)≈ $10.00 / point≈ $27,700

The weeks that were not great — published anyway

An honest record includes the rough patches, so here are ours. The first documented week (25–29 August 2025) closed at 87.5% with 3 losing trades. Late September 2025 dipped to 86.7% — the weakest accuracy in the record. 8–12 June 2026 logged 4 losses against 33 winners at 89.5%. There is also a reporting gap in mid-February 2026 where one week published no success-rate figure and is therefore excluded from the average rather than guessed at.

Hiding losses is the first red flag of a dishonest provider — screenshots of winners cost nothing, while a continuous public ledger with losing weeks in it is the one thing that cannot be faked retroactively. If you are comparing providers, demand the same standard from all of them; our checklist for doing that is in the what are trading signals guide. And treat the gaps the same way as the losses: a provider that only reports when the news is good is running marketing, not a record. The average quoted on this page is computed strictly over the 38 weeks that published a success-rate figure — nothing interpolated, nothing back-filled.

Do these results repeat? The straight answer

Past results do not guarantee future results. A 29-week average of 93% accuracy by points does not mean week 26 will match it — markets move in probabilities, weaker weeks will come, and any service promising otherwise is not being straight with you. Trading CFDs and forex carries a substantial risk of loss, whatever record sits behind the signals.

What the record does show is process: a stop loss on every signal, risk held at 1–2% per trade, and results published whether they flatter us or not. If that standard suits you, the same signals behind these numbers are available two ways — free, by opening an XS account with a $400 deposit that stays your trading capital, or paid, via the Telegram bot. Both paths are laid out step by step on the start page.

The two ways to get the signals behind this record

The two ways to get the signals behind this record
Free (fund a broker account)Paid (Telegram bot)
Subscription costNoneMonthly or annual plan
How to startOpen an XS account and deposit $400 (about A$600)Subscribe via the Telegram bot
Your capitalStays in your account — you trade with itNo broker account required
MarketsGold, forex, oil, indices, cryptoGold, forex, oil, indices, crypto

Ready to get started?

Save up to US$2,500 a year

Get the signals free

Open a trading account with XS through our link and deposit US$400 — the capital stays in your account, yours to trade — and you unlock full signals access free, replacing a subscription worth around US$2,500 a year.

  1. 1Open an XS account through our link
  2. 2Deposit US$400 — the capital stays yours to trade
  3. 3Send your proof on Telegram and every signal is free
Open an XS account
Rather just subscribe?

No broker account needed — subscribe through our Telegram bot and get every signal with a clear entry, take-profit and stop-loss, straight to your phone.

Subscribe on Telegram

Our trading signals are a separate service run by Best Trading Signal. They are not provided or endorsed by any broker; free access with an XS deposit is our own offer.

Trading forex and CFDs carries a real risk of losing money. Our signals are general market analysis, not personal financial advice.

Written and reviewed by
Best Trading Signal — editorial & analysis team

We review brokers on licensing, cost and withdrawals — and state the cons, not just the pros. How our signals are produced · Risk Disclosure · Last updated 5 October 2026

Frequently asked questions

Yes — every number on this page comes from the published weekly reports, and the full week-by-week table sits openly on the performance page: 38 weeks from August 2025 to Oct 2026, averaging 93% accuracy by points with +203,676 net points. Losing weeks and reporting gaps are shown, not smoothed over.

Each week, points won by closed winning signals are compared against points lost by losers; 93% means winners represented, on average, 93% of the total points moved. It is not a claim that 93% of trades win — it is a size-weighted measure that small winners cannot inflate and large losses cannot hide from.

The week of 2–6 February 2026: +15,960 net points at 97.5% accuracy by points, driven mainly by gold and index signals. The record also includes two perfect 100% weeks — 1–5 September 2025 and 20–24 April 2026 — with zero losing trades in either.

Weaker weeks, yes, and they are published: 86.7% in late September 2025, 87.5% in the first documented week, and an 89.5% week in June 2026 with four losing trades. Every reported week in the record closed with positive net points, but weaker stretches are part of any honest ledger, and future losing weeks are always possible.

Using the latest published week (+2,770 net points) and an indicative $0.10 per point at 0.01 lots, roughly $277 — around A$423 — before spreads and swaps. That is a historical estimate, not a projection; point values differ by instrument and broker, and results vary week to week.

Because win rate by trade count is easy to game: many tiny winners can mask a few large losses and still show a high percentage. Points-based accuracy weights each trade by its actual size, so the headline number and the net-points total have to agree with each other. It is the harder, more honest measure.

Nobody can promise that, and we will not. Past performance does not guarantee future results; markets shift and weaker weeks will come. What stays constant is the process — a stop loss on every signal, capped risk per trade, and every week's result published to the same public record you can check before committing anything.

Two ways: free, by opening an XS account through our link and depositing $400 that stays yours as trading capital — or paid, by subscribing through the Telegram bot with no broker account needed. Both deliver the same feed across gold, forex, oil, indices and crypto with entry, TP and SL on every signal.

Trading forex, CFDs and crypto carries a real risk of losing money and isn't suitable for everyone — our signals are analyst opinions and general information, not personal financial advice, and past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Last updated 5 October 2026

Open an XS accountSubscribe on Telegram