Weekly Trading Signal Results: 94% Accuracy by Points Across 25 Published Weeks

The whole record, in one view

This page lays out the real trading signal results behind Best Trading Signal — the same signals service that runs our Arabic sister brand — reported week by week from 25 August 2025 to 3 July 2026. None of it is backtested or simulated: each line comes from a weekly report issued after the trades closed, and the losing weeks sit in the table beside the winning ones.

For a Canadian trader sizing up any provider, the question is never "can they show me a good week?" — anyone can. The question is whether the *entire* tape is public, measured in a unit that cannot be massaged. Our answer is a permanent week-by-week table on the performance page and this guide, which walks the headline numbers, the standouts, the soft patches and the math underneath.

The record is complete and conservative by construction: it includes every week for which a results report was published — no curation, no backfilling — and accuracy is computed by points, so a single large loss drags the figure down at full weight.

The latest report: 29 June – 3 July 2026

The newest entry on the record closed at +5,510 net points with 92.9% accuracy by points: 22 winning trades, 3 losses and 6 break-even across gold, indices, forex, oil and crypto. It is a fair sample of what an ordinary week looks like — clearly profitable, no single trade carrying the total, and the losses reported in plain numbers.

The six break-even trades deserve a sentence, because they show the management style: when a trade reaches partial profit, the stop moves to the entry price, and if the market then reverses, the position closes flat — neither win nor loss, and reported as neither. Each new weekly report lands on the performance page as published, so everything in this guide can be reconciled against the live table at any time.

To translate points into money for your own planning: a point's dollar value depends on the instrument and your lot size, so the same +5,510-point week means different outcomes for different accounts. At a typical $0.10 per point on a 0.01 lot, it would be roughly $550; ten times that at 0.10 lots. Treat these strictly as illustrations, not projections — your fills, spreads and sizing decide the real figure, and losing weeks reduce it.

Accuracy by points: the metric that cannot be gamed

The headline 94% is accuracy by points, not a win rate by trade count — and for anyone comparing providers, that distinction is everything. Counting trades lets a provider win eight 10-point trades, lose two 100-point trades, and market an "80% win rate" on an account that lost money. Points-based accounting closes that loophole: every point surrendered at a stop is weighed at full value against every point captured at a target.

Each week, the calculation takes total points won versus total points lost and expresses the winning share; the 94% is the plain average of the 25 weekly readings. Points are also why the record is equally meaningful in Canada as anywhere: they are currency-neutral. Whether your account is in Canadian dollars or anything else, points convert to money purely through your own position size — the vetting checklist in the best trading signals guide shows how to demand the same math from any provider.

It is also why we do not publish dollar-profit screenshots. Dollar figures scale with lot size and prove only that somebody traded big; points measure how much market movement the signals actually captured.

Month by month across the record

Grouping the 25 weekly reports by month shows the texture of the record — heavy months, ordinary months, and gaps. The monthly figures below are sums of published weekly reports and reconcile exactly to the +135,081 total.

Where a month is absent — May 2026, for instance — no qualifying weekly report was published in it, and we leave the gap rather than estimate. An unbroken-looking record with no gaps is usually a sign of backfilling, not of perfection.