Skip to content
Get the signals freeSee the verified track record
Best Trading Signalbesttradingsignal.com
trading signals results

Weekly Trading Signal Results: 93% Average Accuracy by Points Over 38 Published Weeks

Real weekly trading signal results: 93% average accuracy by points and +203,676 net points over 38 published weeks since August 2025. Latest week: +5,785 at 91.17%.

At a glance

Best Trading Signal has published 38 consecutive weekly result reports from August 2025 to October 2026: 93% average weekly accuracy by points and +203,676 net points in total. The most recent week (28 September – 2 October 2026) closed at +5,785 net points and 91.17% by points across 36 signals — 28 wins, 5 losses and 3 break-even. The strongest week on record delivered +15,960 points at 97.5% (2–6 Feb 2026). Every week — losses included — is public. Get the same signals free via a $400 XS deposit that stays yours, or via our Telegram bot.

  • 38 published weeks from August 2025 to October 2026 — 93% average weekly accuracy by points, +203,676 net points
  • Best week on record: +15,960 points at 97.5% accuracy (2–6 Feb 2026); two perfect 100% weeks (Sep 2025 and Apr 2026)
  • Latest week (28 Sep – 2 Oct 2026): +5,785 net points at 91.17% — 36 signals, 28 wins, 5 losses, 3 break-even
  • Gold carried the week: +2,845 net across 15 gold trades (ten wins, four losses, one break-even), including runs of +630 and +550
  • Losses are published, not hidden — the weakest weeks (86.7%, 87%) are in the record alongside the best
  • Accuracy is measured by points, not by counting trades — one big loss counts at full weight
  • Get the same signals: free via a $400 XS deposit that stays yours, or via the Telegram bot

The latest week: 28 September – 2 October 2026

The most recent report closed the week of 28 September to 2 October 2026 at +5,785 net points with 91.17% accuracy by points — 36 signals: 28 wins, 5 losses and 3 break-even. Just under our 93% average, and published exactly as it closed.

Gold carried the week — 15 trades for +2,845 net, including runs of +630 and +550, but also four of the week's five losses. US oil added +1,050 from three winning signals and the S&P 500 +850 from three. Forex was steady rather than spectacular: 12 signals across nine pairs for +670 net, with a single loss on EUR/USD.

Week of 28 September – 2 October 2026, by instrument

Week of 28 September – 2 October 2026, by instrument
InstrumentSignalsNet points
XAU/USD15+2,845
US oil3+1,050
S&P 5003+850
DAX3+370
CHF/JPY2+200
EUR/JPY2+170
USD/JPY2+100
AUD/USD1+70
GBP/USD1+60
GBP/JPY1+50
NZD/USD1+50
USD/CHF1+40
EUR/USD1−70
Total36+5,785

The week before: 14–18 September 2026

The previous report closed the week of 14 to 18 September 2026 at +6,685 net points with 97.99% accuracy by points — 38 signals in total: 34 wins, 2 losses and 2 break-even, spread across gold, oil, indices and forex. Above our 93% average, and it stays published exactly as it closed — both weeks sit here side by side on purpose.

Gold carried the week without a single losing trade: 12 gold trades for +3,365 net, including a single +560 run. US oil added +1,100 from two signals and the S&P 500 +700 from two.

The week's only two losses were small — a combined −140 against +6,825 won. Every new weekly report is added to the performance page as it is published, so what you read here is always checkable against the live record.

Week of 14–18 September 2026, by instrument

Week of 14–18 September 2026, by instrument
InstrumentSignalsNet points
XAU/USD12+3,365
US oil2+1,100
DAX8+780
S&P 5002+700
NASDAQ2+280
GBP/JPY2+180
Dow Jones1+140
CHF/JPY2+120
USD/JPY2+90
USD/CAD1+70
EUR/USD1−60
GBP/USD1−80
Other FX (break-even)20
Total38+6,685

What 'accuracy by points' means — and why it is stricter

Our headline number is accuracy by points, not a win rate by trade count — and the difference is the whole game. A provider can win 8 small trades of 10 points and lose 2 trades of 100 points: that is an '80% win rate' on a losing account. Points-based accounting makes that trick impossible, because every point lost at a stop counts at full weight against the points won at targets.

Concretely: each week, all points gained at take-profit are set against all points lost at stop loss, and the accuracy is the share of points won out of total points moved. The 93% figure is the unweighted average of those 38 weekly readings. When you compare us — or anyone — against other providers, demand the same math; the best trading signals guide has a full checklist for vetting providers.

The same logic explains why we report net points rather than dollar profits. Dollars scale with lot size, so a screenshot showing thousands of dollars proves only that someone traded big. Points are the honest unit: they measure how much market movement the signals actually captured, and any reader can convert them through their own position size.

Month by month: the full published record

Aggregating the 38 weekly reports by month shows the shape of the record — strong months, ordinary months, and gaps where no qualifying report was published. Every number below is the sum of that month's published weekly reports; the totals reconcile exactly to +203,676 points.

The gaps are part of the honesty. Months such as May 2026 show no entry because no qualifying weekly report was published in them — the record includes only weeks with a reported success rate, and we do not backfill or estimate the missing ones.

Net points by month across the published record

Net points by month across the published record
MonthPublished weeksNet points
August 20251+1,680
September 20253+8,390
October 20254+16,346
November 20251+6,770
December 20252+6,770
January 20263+22,605
February 20262+20,985
March 20262+13,710
April 20262+9,740
June 20264+22,575
July 20265+26,995
August 20264+17,950
September 20265+29,160
Total38+203,676

Ready to start?

Save up to $2,500/yr

Get the signals free

Open a trading account with XS through our link and deposit $400 — the capital stays in your account, yours to trade — and you unlock full signals access free, replacing a subscription worth around $2,500/yr.

  1. 1Open an XS account through our link
  2. 2Deposit $400 — the capital stays yours to trade
  3. 3Send your proof on Telegram and get every signal free
Open an XS account
Prefer to just subscribe?

No broker account needed — subscribe through our Telegram bot and start receiving every signal with a clear entry, take-profit and stop-loss.

Subscribe on Telegram

Our trading signals are a separate service run by Best Trading Signal. They are not provided or endorsed by any broker; free access with an XS deposit is our own offer.

Trading forex and CFDs involves substantial risk of loss. Signals are analyst opinions, not investment advice.

The standout weeks

A handful of weeks carried an outsized share of the record. 2–6 February 2026 remains the strongest on file: +15,960 points in a single week at 97.5% accuracy, driven by gold and indices. 26–30 January 2026 delivered +10,505 points at 98.5%, and the extended late-October 2025 stretch added +7,431 points at 95.9%. Two weeks closed perfect at 100%: 1–5 September 2025 (+3,420 points, thirteen wins, zero losses) and 20–24 April 2026 (+5,695 points, not a single losing trade).

Read these for what they are — the best of the record, not the norm. The typical published week lands between roughly +2,000 and +7,000 net points at accuracy in the low-to-mid 90s, with gold usually contributing the largest share. The gold signals guide covers why gold dominates the tape.

Best published weeks on record

Best published weeks on record
WeekAccuracy (by points)Net points
2–6 Feb 202697.5%+15,960
26–30 Jan 202698.5%+10,505
20–31 Oct 202595.9%+7,431
22–26 Jun 202697.3%+7,240
16–20 Mar 202695.9%+7,010
13–17 Jul 202697.5%+6,930
20–24 Apr 2026100%+5,695
1–5 Sep 2025100%+3,420

We publish the weak weeks too

Any channel can post its winners. What makes results verifiable is publishing the whole tape — and ours includes weeks we are less proud of. The weakest published accuracy was 83.9% (3–7 August 2026), followed by 85.55% (21–25 September 2026) and 86.7% (29 Sep – 3 Oct 2025), with 87% (6–10 Oct 2025) and the very first documented week at 87.5% — which included 3 losing trades against 21 winners — close behind. The week of 8–12 June 2026 closed at 89.5% with 4 losses and a break-even.

Recent weeks belong in this section as much as in the one above. 21–25 September 2026 closed at 85.55% — more than seven points below our running average, with eight losing trades. We led that report with it anyway, because a track record that only ever moves up is a track record nobody should believe.

Notice something about those 'bad' weeks: all of them still closed with positive net points, because the stop-loss discipline kept individual losses small. That is the entire argument for complete signals — the losses are capped by design. Hiding losses is the first mark of a dishonest provider; if a service you are evaluating shows only winners, walk away.

Will these results repeat? The honest answer

Past results do not guarantee future results. A record averaging 93% by points does not mean next week will hit 93% — markets move in probabilities, weaker weeks are already in the record, and more will come. Any provider promising fixed or guaranteed returns is not being honest with you, whatever their screenshots show.

It is also worth saying plainly what a 93% average does not mean: it does not mean 93 of every 100 trades win, and it does not project any specific money outcome for your account. Your results depend on your own execution, position sizing and discipline in honouring the stops.

What you can rely on is the process that produced the record: a stop loss on every signal, position-size guidance holding risk to 1–2% per trade, staged profit-taking, and results published weekly whether they flatter us or not. Judge us on that process — starting with the live signals — and never trade money you cannot afford to lose.

How to get the signals behind these results

The signals that produced every number on this page are delivered the same two ways as always — and both give you the identical feed with entry, take-profit and stop-loss on every trade. There is no premium tier holding back the good trades: free-path and bot subscribers receive the same alerts at the same moment. Full setup steps are on the start page.

The two ways to get the signals

The two ways to get the signals
Free (fund a broker account)Paid (Telegram bot)
Subscription costNone — replaces a plan worth ~$2,500/yrMonthly or annual plan
How to startOpen an XS account and deposit $400Subscribe via the Telegram bot
Your capitalThe $400 stays in your account — you trade with itNo broker account required
MarketsGold, forex, oil, indices, cryptoGold, forex, oil, indices, crypto

Ready to start?

Save up to $2,500/yr

Get the signals free

Open a trading account with XS through our link and deposit $400 — the capital stays in your account, yours to trade — and you unlock full signals access free, replacing a subscription worth around $2,500/yr.

  1. 1Open an XS account through our link
  2. 2Deposit $400 — the capital stays yours to trade
  3. 3Send your proof on Telegram and get every signal free
Open an XS account
Prefer to just subscribe?

No broker account needed — subscribe through our Telegram bot and start receiving every signal with a clear entry, take-profit and stop-loss.

Subscribe on Telegram

Our trading signals are a separate service run by Best Trading Signal. They are not provided or endorsed by any broker; free access with an XS deposit is our own offer.

Trading forex and CFDs involves substantial risk of loss. Signals are analyst opinions, not investment advice.

Written and reviewed by
Best Trading Signal — editorial & analysis team

We review brokers on licensing, cost and withdrawals — and state the cons, not just the pros. How our signals are produced · Risk Disclosure · Last updated October 5, 2026

Frequently asked questions

Across 38 published weekly reports from August 2025 to October 2026, the record shows a 93% average weekly accuracy by points and +203,676 total net points on gold, forex, oil, indices and crypto. Every week — including the weakest at 86.7% — is public on the performance page.

By points, not by counting trades: each week, points won at take-profit are set against points lost at stop loss, and accuracy is the share of points won out of total points moved. The 93% is the average of the 38 weekly readings. One large loss counts at full weight, so the metric cannot be gamed.

The week of 2–6 February 2026: +15,960 net points at 97.5% accuracy by points, led by gold and indices. Two other weeks closed perfect at 100% — 1–5 September 2025 (+3,420 points) and 20–24 April 2026 (+5,695 points) — with zero losing trades.

Yes — that is the point of the record. The weakest published weeks were 83.9% (3–7 August 2026) and 85.55% (21–25 September 2026), and reports state losses and break-even trades explicitly (for example, 23 wins, 8 losses and 7 break-even across 38 signals in the week of 21–25 September 2026, which closed at 85.55% — below our average). Hidden losses are the first mark of a fake provider.

Open the performance page, where the full week-by-week table — accuracy and net points for all 38 published weeks — is public. Then follow the live signals for a month and compare your own logged results against the next weekly reports. Verification over time beats any screenshot.

No. Past results never guarantee future performance — weaker weeks are already in the record, and more will come. What continues is the process: a stop loss on every signal, 1–2% risk per trade, and weekly publication of the results whether they flatter us or not.

Net points are the sum of price movement captured across all trades — points won minus points lost. They are currency-neutral: a trader in any country can convert them through their own position size, whereas dollar screenshots depend on lot size and prove nothing about signal quality.

No — the record is measured in points, which are identical worldwide. Your account currency only affects how each point converts to money through your position size. The same entries, targets and stops go to every subscriber globally at the same moment via Telegram.

Two ways: free, by opening an XS account through our link and depositing $400 that stays in your account as your own trading capital; or paid, by subscribing through the Telegram bot with no broker account needed. Both deliver the identical signals with entry, TP and SL.

Related guides

Trading forex, CFDs and crypto carries a substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for every investor — our signals are analyst opinions, not guaranteed profits, and past performance does not guarantee future results.

Last updated October 5, 2026

Open an XS accountSubscribe on Telegram