Weekly Trading Signal Results: 94% Average Accuracy and +135,081 Points, Published in Full

The headline numbers: 25 weeks, published in full

These are the real, published trading signal results behind Best Trading Signal — the same signals service whose alerts cover gold, forex, oil, indices and crypto. From 25 August 2025 to 3 July 2026 we published 25 weekly results reports, and the full week-by-week table lives permanently on our performance page. Nothing here is a screenshot or a highlight reel: winners and losers are reported together, every week.

The measure that matters most in any results claim is not the size of the numbers but whether you can verify them before paying. So here is the whole record, summarised first and then unpacked:

How we measure accuracy: by points, not by trade count

Every weekly figure in our record is accuracy by points, not a count of winning trades. The method: each take-profit hit adds the points it gained, each stop loss subtracts the points it lost, and the week's accuracy is the share of points won out of total points moved. Net points is simply everything gained minus everything lost.

Why insist on this? Because trade-count win rates are the oldest trick in the signals business. A channel can win eight trades of 10 points, lose two trades of 100 points, and market itself as '80% accurate' while its followers bleed money. Points-based accounting makes that arithmetic impossible to hide — a big loss drags the week down at full weight. If you are new to reading records like this, our plain-English guide to what trading signals are covers every term used on this page.

The weekly reports themselves go a level deeper than the headline pair of numbers: each one states the count of winning, losing and break-even trades and names the markets that drove the result. That granularity is deliberate — it lets a sceptical reader reconstruct the week rather than take a percentage on faith, and it means a single outsized gold trade cannot quietly carry an otherwise poor week without that being visible.

Standout weeks from the record

A 25-week average smooths out the texture, so here are the weeks worth studying — taken directly from the published reports. The record week, 2–6 February 2026, banked +15,960 points at 97.5% on gold and indices. The 26–30 January 2026 week reached 98.5% with +10,505 points across the full instrument range — the strongest accuracy figure in the record. And two separate weeks closed with zero losing trades: 1–5 September 2025 (13 winners, +3,420 points, led by Bitcoin, Nasdaq and gold) and 20–24 April 2026 (+5,695 points without a single loss). January and early February 2026 were the standout stretch overall, with three consecutive reports above 96%.

Gold has been the engine of the record throughout — which is why the dedicated gold signals guide exists — with forex majors and indices contributing steadily and oil and crypto adding selective trades. Study the strong weeks for what they share: selective volume, staged targets, and stops moved to break-even early, rather than any burst of extra trading.

The most recent weeks, exactly as published

Recency matters more than history: a provider is only as good as its current process. Here are the latest five published weeks, unedited — including the June week that dipped below 90%. Note the detail in the reports themselves: the 8–12 June week, for instance, logged 33 winning trades against 4 losses and one break-even across 13 instruments, while the 15–19 June week recorded 21 winners, 5 losers and 7 break-even trades across gold, indices, forex, oil and crypto.

Five weeks is also roughly the evaluation window we suggest to new followers: long enough to see both a strong week and a soft one, short enough to decide without a large commitment. Follow the live signals alongside this table and check that what arrives on Telegram matches what gets reported — that correspondence is the entire test of a signals service.