Saltar al contenido
Señales independientes, sin afiliación con ningún brókerRevisa el historial verificado
Best Trading Signalbesttradingsignal.com
trading signals results

Weekly Trading Signal Results: 93% Average Accuracy by Points Over 37 Published Weeks

Real weekly trading signal results: 93% average accuracy by points and +197,891 net points over 37 published weeks since August 2025. Latest week: +4,380 at 85.55%.

En resumen

Best Trading Signal has published 37 consecutive weekly result reports from August 2025 to September 2026: 93% average weekly accuracy by points and +197,891 net points in total. The most recent week (21–25 September 2026) closed at +4,380 net points and 85.55% by points across 38 signals — 23 wins, 8 losses and 7 break-even. The strongest week on record delivered +15,960 points at 97.5% (2–6 Feb 2026). Every week — losses included — is public. Get the same signals through our Telegram bot subscription, a separate service not affiliated with any broker.

  • 37 published weeks from August 2025 to September 2026 — 93% average weekly accuracy by points, +197,891 net points
  • Best week on record: +15,960 points at 97.5% accuracy (2–6 Feb 2026); two perfect 100% weeks (Sep 2025 and Apr 2026)
  • Latest week (21–25 Sep 2026): +4,380 net points at 85.55% — 38 signals, 23 wins, 8 losses, 7 break-even
  • Gold led the week on volume: +1,285 net across 12 gold trades (eight wins, three losses, one break-even), including a single +400 run
  • Losses are published, not hidden — the weakest weeks (86.7%, 87%) are in the record alongside the best
  • Accuracy is measured by points, not by counting trades — one big loss counts at full weight
  • Get the same signals: subscribe via the Telegram bot — no broker account required

The latest week: 21–25 September 2026

The most recent report closed the week of 21 to 25 September 2026 at +4,380 net points with 85.55% accuracy by points — 38 signals: 23 wins, 8 losses and 7 break-even. Below our 93% average, and published exactly as it closed.

Gold led the week on volume — 12 trades for +1,285 net, including a single +400 run, but also three of the week's eight losses. The S&P 500 added +1,350 from three signals and the NASDAQ +920 from two, each with a +600 run of its own. DAX was the softest instrument — six signals for just +100 net, with two losses of its own.

Week of 21–25 September 2026, by instrument

Week of 21–25 September 2026, by instrument
InstrumentSignalsNet points
XAU/USD12+1,285
S&P 5003+1,350
NASDAQ2+920
US oil2+400
CHF/JPY2+275
Dow Jones1+200
DAX6+100
GBP/JPY2+50
NZD/USD1+30
EUR/USD2−70
GBP/USD2−80
USD/JPY1−80
Other FX (break-even)20
Total38+4,380

The week before: 14–18 September 2026

The previous report closed the week of 14 to 18 September 2026 at +6,685 net points with 97.99% accuracy by points — 38 signals in total: 34 wins, 2 losses and 2 break-even, spread across gold, oil, indices and forex. Above our 93% average, and it stays published exactly as it closed — both weeks sit here side by side on purpose.

Gold carried the week without a single losing trade: 12 gold trades for +3,365 net, including a single +560 run. US oil added +1,100 from two signals and the S&P 500 +700 from two.

The week's only two losses were small — a combined −140 against +6,825 won. Every new weekly report is added to the performance page as it is published, so what you read here is always checkable against the live record.

Week of 14–18 September 2026, by instrument

Week of 14–18 September 2026, by instrument
InstrumentSignalsNet points
XAU/USD12+3,365
US oil2+1,100
DAX8+780
S&P 5002+700
NASDAQ2+280
GBP/JPY2+180
Dow Jones1+140
CHF/JPY2+120
USD/JPY2+90
USD/CAD1+70
EUR/USD1−60
GBP/USD1−80
Other FX (break-even)20
Total38+6,685

What 'accuracy by points' means — and why it is stricter

Our headline number is accuracy by points, not a win rate by trade count — and the difference is the whole game. A provider can win 8 small trades of 10 points and lose 2 trades of 100 points: that is an '80% win rate' on a losing account. Points-based accounting makes that trick impossible, because every point lost at a stop counts at full weight against the points won at targets.

Concretely: each week, all points gained at take-profit are set against all points lost at stop loss, and the accuracy is the share of points won out of total points moved. The 93% figure is the unweighted average of those 37 weekly readings. When you compare us — or anyone — against other providers, demand the same math; the best trading signals guide has a full checklist for vetting providers.

The same logic explains why we report net points rather than dollar profits. Dollars scale with lot size, so a screenshot showing thousands of dollars proves only that someone traded big. Points are the honest unit: they measure how much market movement the signals actually captured, and any reader can convert them through their own position size.

Month by month: the full published record

Aggregating the 37 weekly reports by month shows the shape of the record — strong months, ordinary months, and gaps where no qualifying report was published. Every number below is the sum of that month's published weekly reports; the totals reconcile exactly to +197,891 points.

The gaps are part of the honesty. Months such as May 2026 show no entry because no qualifying weekly report was published in them — the record includes only weeks with a reported success rate, and we do not backfill or estimate the missing ones.

Net points by month across the published record

Net points by month across the published record
MonthPublished weeksNet points
August 20251+1,680
September 20253+8,390
October 20254+16,346
November 20251+6,770
December 20252+6,770
January 20263+22,605
February 20262+20,985
March 20262+13,710
April 20262+9,740
June 20264+22,575
July 20265+26,995
August 20264+17,950
September 20264+23,375
Total37+197,891

¿Listo para empezar?

Nuestras señales de trading son un servicio independiente de Best Trading Signal. No están afiliadas a ningún bróker, ni las provee ni las respalda ninguno.

Suscríbete a las señales

Suscríbete por nuestro bot de Telegram y recibe cada señal con entrada, take-profit y stop-loss claros. No necesitas cuenta con ningún bróker: puedes seguir las señales con cualquier bróker regulado.

Suscribirme en Telegram
¿Necesitas un bróker?

Nuestro bróker mejor clasificado es Pepperstone: cuenta con la autorización de siete reguladores, entre ellos ASIC, la FCA y CySEC, con spreads desde 0.0 pips en la cuenta Razor. Abrir una cuenta con un bróker es opcional y va aparte de la suscripción a las señales.

Abrir una cuenta en Pepperstone

Risk warning (Pepperstone, Jul–Sep 2026): 72.9% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider under FCA and CySEC, 75.2% under BaFin, 79.6% under SCB and 75–95% under CMA. The figure depends on the licensed entity your account is opened with. Make sure you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford the high risk of losing your money.

Operar forex y CFDs implica un riesgo alto de perder dinero. Las señales son opiniones de analistas, no asesoría de inversión. Ninguno de los brókers de CFDs de este sitio cuenta con autorización de la CNBV.

The standout weeks

A handful of weeks carried an outsized share of the record. 2–6 February 2026 remains the strongest on file: +15,960 points in a single week at 97.5% accuracy, driven by gold and indices. 26–30 January 2026 delivered +10,505 points at 98.5%, and the extended late-October 2025 stretch added +7,431 points at 95.9%. Two weeks closed perfect at 100%: 1–5 September 2025 (+3,420 points, thirteen wins, zero losses) and 20–24 April 2026 (+5,695 points, not a single losing trade).

Read these for what they are — the best of the record, not the norm. The typical published week lands between roughly +2,000 and +7,000 net points at accuracy in the low-to-mid 90s, with gold usually contributing the largest share. The gold signals guide covers why gold dominates the tape.

Best published weeks on record

Best published weeks on record
WeekAccuracy (by points)Net points
2–6 Feb 202697.5%+15,960
26–30 Jan 202698.5%+10,505
20–31 Oct 202595.9%+7,431
22–26 Jun 202697.3%+7,240
16–20 Mar 202695.9%+7,010
13–17 Jul 202697.5%+6,930
20–24 Apr 2026100%+5,695
1–5 Sep 2025100%+3,420

We publish the weak weeks too

Any channel can post its winners. What makes results verifiable is publishing the whole tape — and ours includes weeks we are less proud of. The weakest published accuracy was 83.9% (3–7 August 2026), followed by 85.55% (21–25 September 2026) and 86.7% (29 Sep – 3 Oct 2025), with 87% (6–10 Oct 2025) and the very first documented week at 87.5% — which included 3 losing trades against 21 winners — close behind. The week of 8–12 June 2026 closed at 89.5% with 4 losses and a break-even.

Recent weeks belong in this section as much as in the one above. 21–25 September 2026 closed at 85.55% — more than seven points below our running average, with eight losing trades. We led that report with it anyway, because a track record that only ever moves up is a track record nobody should believe.

Notice something about those 'bad' weeks: all of them still closed with positive net points, because the stop-loss discipline kept individual losses small. That is the entire argument for complete signals — the losses are capped by design. Hiding losses is the first mark of a dishonest provider; if a service you are evaluating shows only winners, walk away.

Will these results repeat? The honest answer

Past results do not guarantee future results. A record averaging 93% by points does not mean next week will hit 93% — markets move in probabilities, weaker weeks are already in the record, and more will come. Any provider promising fixed or guaranteed returns is not being honest with you, whatever their screenshots show.

It is also worth saying plainly what a 93% average does not mean: it does not mean 93 of every 100 trades win, and it does not project any specific money outcome for your account. Your results depend on your own execution, position sizing and discipline in honouring the stops.

What you can rely on is the process that produced the record: a stop loss on every signal, position-size guidance holding risk to 1–2% per trade, staged profit-taking, and results published weekly whether they flatter us or not. Judge us on that process — starting with the live signals — and never trade money you cannot afford to lose.

How to get the signals behind these results

The signals that produced every number on this page are delivered through our paid Telegram bot subscription, with entry, take-profit and stop-loss on every trade. There is no premium tier holding back the good trades: every subscriber receives the same alerts at the same moment. Our trading signals are a separate service run by Best Trading Signal and are not affiliated with, provided by or endorsed by any broker. Full setup steps are on the start page.

¿Listo para empezar?

Nuestras señales de trading son un servicio independiente de Best Trading Signal. No están afiliadas a ningún bróker, ni las provee ni las respalda ninguno.

Suscríbete a las señales

Suscríbete por nuestro bot de Telegram y recibe cada señal con entrada, take-profit y stop-loss claros. No necesitas cuenta con ningún bróker: puedes seguir las señales con cualquier bróker regulado.

Suscribirme en Telegram
¿Necesitas un bróker?

Nuestro bróker mejor clasificado es Pepperstone: cuenta con la autorización de siete reguladores, entre ellos ASIC, la FCA y CySEC, con spreads desde 0.0 pips en la cuenta Razor. Abrir una cuenta con un bróker es opcional y va aparte de la suscripción a las señales.

Abrir una cuenta en Pepperstone

Risk warning (Pepperstone, Jul–Sep 2026): 72.9% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider under FCA and CySEC, 75.2% under BaFin, 79.6% under SCB and 75–95% under CMA. The figure depends on the licensed entity your account is opened with. Make sure you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford the high risk of losing your money.

Operar forex y CFDs implica un riesgo alto de perder dinero. Las señales son opiniones de analistas, no asesoría de inversión. Ninguno de los brókers de CFDs de este sitio cuenta con autorización de la CNBV.

Escrito y revisado por
Best Trading Signal — el equipo editorial y de análisis

Evaluamos brókers por licencia, costos y retiros — y señalamos las desventajas, no sólo lo bueno. Cómo se producen nuestras señales · Aviso de Riesgo · Última actualización 28 de septiembre de 2026

Preguntas frecuentes

Across 37 published weekly reports from August 2025 to August 2026, the record shows a 93% average weekly accuracy by points and +197,891 total net points on gold, forex, oil, indices and crypto. Every week — including the weakest at 86.7% — is public on the performance page.

By points, not by counting trades: each week, points won at take-profit are set against points lost at stop loss, and accuracy is the share of points won out of total points moved. The 93% is the average of the 37 weekly readings. One large loss counts at full weight, so the metric cannot be gamed.

The week of 2–6 February 2026: +15,960 net points at 97.5% accuracy by points, led by gold and indices. Two other weeks closed perfect at 100% — 1–5 September 2025 (+3,420 points) and 20–24 April 2026 (+5,695 points) — with zero losing trades.

Yes — that is the point of the record. The weakest published weeks were 83.9% (3–7 August 2026) and 85.55% (21–25 September 2026), and reports state losses and break-even trades explicitly (for example, 23 wins, 8 losses and 7 break-even across 38 signals in the week of 21–25 September 2026, which closed at 85.55% — below our average). Hidden losses are the first mark of a fake provider.

Open the performance page, where the full week-by-week table — accuracy and net points for all 37 published weeks — is public. Then follow the live signals for a month and compare your own logged results against the next weekly reports. Verification over time beats any screenshot.

No. Past results never guarantee future performance — weaker weeks are already in the record, and more will come. What continues is the process: a stop loss on every signal, 1–2% risk per trade, and weekly publication of the results whether they flatter us or not.

Net points are the sum of price movement captured across all trades — points won minus points lost. They are currency-neutral: a trader in any country can convert them through their own position size, whereas dollar screenshots depend on lot size and prove nothing about signal quality.

No — the record is measured in points, which are identical worldwide. Your account currency only affects how each point converts to money through your position size. The same entries, targets and stops go to every subscriber globally at the same moment via Telegram.

Subscribe through the Telegram bot with no broker account needed. You receive every signal with entry, TP and SL, and you can follow them with any regulated broker.

Guías relacionadas

Operar forex, CFDs y criptomonedas implica un riesgo alto de perder dinero y no es para todos los perfiles — nuestras señales son opiniones de analistas, no ganancias garantizadas, y los resultados pasados no aseguran resultados futuros. Los brókers de CFDs que reseñamos no están autorizados por la CNBV: a un residente en México lo da de alta una entidad extranjera.

Última actualización 28 de septiembre de 2026

Suscribirme en Telegram