See the verified track record

Our track record — every week, published

This page is the record most Telegram signal groups never show you. Since August 2025 the desk has published its results every week — wins, losses and break-evens included — and measured accuracy the strict way: by points, not by trade count.

At a glance

Best Trading Signal has published weekly results since August 2025: a 94% average weekly accuracy measured by points and +135,081 net points across 25 reported weeks through July 2026. Accuracy is calculated from points won versus points lost — not by counting winning trades — and every figure traces back to timestamped Telegram calls with entry, take-profit and stop-loss.

94% average weekly accuracy — measured by points, not trade count
+135,081 net points over 25 published weeks (Aug 2025 – Jul 2026)
Best week on record: +15,960 points at 97.5% (2–6 Feb 2026)
Two perfect 100% weeks (1–5 Sep 2025 and 20–24 Apr 2026)
Lowest published weekly accuracy: 86.7% — losses happen, stops cap them

94%

Accuracy (by points)

Published weekly reports

+135,081

Net points

August 2025 – July 2026

Weeks

August 2025 – July 2026

Accuracy (by points)

August 2025 – July 2026

100%75%50%25%0%

25–29 Aug 2025Accuracy (by points) 87.5% · +1,680 Net points1–5 Sep 2025Accuracy (by points) 100% · +3,420 Net points15–19 Sep 2025Accuracy (by points) 93% · +3,065 Net points22–26 Sep 2025Accuracy (by points) 90% · +1,905 Net points29 Sep – 3 Oct 2025Accuracy (by points) 86.7% · +2,365 Net points6–10 Oct 2025Accuracy (by points) 87% · +3,416 Net points13–17 Oct 2025Accuracy (by points) 93.2% · +3,134 Net points20–31 Oct 2025Accuracy (by points) 95.9% · +7,431 Net points1–10 Nov 2025Accuracy (by points) 92% · +6,770 Net points15–19 Dec 2025Accuracy (by points) 90% · +2,780 Net points29 Dec – 2 Jan 2026Accuracy (by points) 95% · +3,990 Net points12–16 Jan 2026Accuracy (by points) 96.5% · +5,360 Net points19–23 Jan 2026Accuracy (by points) 96% · +6,740 Net points26–30 Jan 2026Accuracy (by points) 98.5% · +10,505 Net points2–6 Feb 2026Accuracy (by points) 97.5% · +15,960 Net points23–27 Feb 2026Accuracy (by points) 93% · +5,025 Net points9–13 Mar 2026Accuracy (by points) 96% · +6,700 Net points16–20 Mar 2026Accuracy (by points) 95.9% · +7,010 Net points13–17 Apr 2026Accuracy (by points) 95.5% · +4,045 Net points20–24 Apr 2026Accuracy (by points) 100% · +5,695 Net points1–5 Jun 2026Accuracy (by points) 96.2% · +5,705 Net points8–12 Jun 2026Accuracy (by points) 89.5% · +4,385 Net points15–19 Jun 2026Accuracy (by points) 90.7% · +5,245 Net points22–26 Jun 2026Accuracy (by points) 97.3% · +7,240 Net points29 Jun – 3 Jul 2026Accuracy (by points) 92.9% · +5,510 Net points

AugustOctoberNovemberJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilJuneJuly

See the verified track record

Week	Accuracy (by points)	Net points	At a glance
29 Jun – 3 Jul 2026July	92.9%	+5,510	+5,510 net points at a 92.9% success rate (by points) on gold, indices, forex, oil and crypto — 22 winning trades against 3 losses and 6 break-even.
22–26 Jun 2026June	97.3%	+7,240	+7,240 net points at a 97.3% success rate (by points) on gold, indices, forex and crypto — 22 winning trades against 3 losses and 4 break-even.
15–19 Jun 2026June	90.7%	+5,245	+5,245 net points at a 90.7% success rate (by points) on gold, indices, forex, oil and crypto — 21 winning trades against 5 losses and 7 break-even.
8–12 Jun 2026June	89.5%	+4,385	+4,385 net points across 13 instruments at an 89.5% success rate — 33 winning trades against 4 losses and one break-even.
1–5 Jun 2026June	96.2%	+5,705	+5,705 net points at a 96.2% success rate on gold, forex and indices.
20–24 Apr 2026April	100%	+5,695	A perfect week: 100% success rate and +5,695 net points with not a single losing trade.
13–17 Apr 2026April	95.5%	+4,045	95.5% success rate and +4,045 net points on gold and forex signals.
16–20 Mar 2026March	95.9%	+7,010	+7,010 net points at a 95.9% success rate across 33 signals, led by gold, Ethereum and oil.
9–13 Mar 2026March	96%	+6,700	A 96% win rate and more than +6,700 points on gold, oil and Nasdaq.
23–27 Feb 2026February	93%	+5,025	A success rate close to 93% and more than +5,025 net points on gold, forex and indices.
2–6 Feb 2026February	97.5%	+15,960	A record: +15,960 points in a single week at a 97.5% success rate — the strongest week on record, on gold and indices.
26–30 Jan 2026January	98.5%	+10,505	An exceptional week: 98.5% success rate and more than +10,505 net points across the full range of instruments.
19–23 Jan 2026January	96%	+6,740	+6,740 net points at a 96% success rate across gold, indices and oil.
12–16 Jan 2026January	96.5%	+5,360	A high 96.5% success rate and +5,360 net points — a standout performance for gold and forex signals.
29 Dec – 2 Jan 2026December	95%	+3,990	The year-transition week: 95% success rate and +3,990 net points on gold and indices.
15–19 Dec 2025December	90%	+2,780	+2,780 net points at a 90% success rate on gold and forex signals heading into year-end.
1–10 Nov 2025November	92%	+6,770	November opened with more than +6,770 points of profit in ten days at a success rate close to 92%.
20–31 Oct 2025October	95.9%	+7,431	An extended late-October stretch delivering +7,431 net points at a 95.9% success rate on gold, indices and oil.
13–17 Oct 2025October	93.2%	+3,134	93.2% success rate and +3,134 net points — a strong week for gold and forex signals.
6–10 Oct 2025October	87%	+3,416	+3,416 net points at a success rate of around 87% across gold, index and oil signals.
29 Sep – 3 Oct 2025October	86.7%	+2,365	+2,365 net points at an 86.7% success rate on gold and forex despite the volatility of early October.
22–26 Sep 2025September	90%	+1,905	A steady week at a 90% success rate and +1,905 net points with strict risk management and a stop-loss on every trade.
15–19 Sep 2025September	93%	+3,065	93% success rate and +3,065 net points spread across gold, forex and index signals.
1–5 Sep 2025September	100%	+3,420	A perfect week: 100% success rate and +3,420 net points across 13 winning trades with zero losses, led by Bitcoin, Nasdaq and gold.
25–29 Aug 2025August	87.5%	+1,680	First documented week in the record: 21 winning trades against 3 losses and +1,680 net points on gold, silver and forex at an 87.5% success rate.

How we measure accuracy — by points, not trade count

Most groups advertise a win rate by trade count: ten small winners and two large losers reads as "83% accurate" even if the account lost money. We refuse that arithmetic. Our weekly accuracy is calculated by points: the points gained on winning calls measured against the points lost on losing ones. One big loss weighs exactly as much as it should.

A point is the standard price-move unit for each instrument as reported in the weekly summaries — so the measure works identically across gold, forex pairs, indices, oil and crypto. Net points for a week is simply everything won minus everything lost.

The record at a glance

25 published weeks between 25 August 2025 and 3 July 2026
94% average weekly accuracy by points (unweighted average of the weekly rates)
+135,081 net points in total, after all losses and break-evens
Weekly accuracy ranged from 86.7% to 100% — no published week closed net-negative
Coverage: gold, silver, forex majors, Nasdaq, S&P, Dow, DAX, oil, Bitcoin and Ethereum

Month by month

Every row below comes from the published weekly reports. Weeks in which no full report was issued are excluded from the record entirely rather than estimated — which is why some months show fewer reported weeks than calendar weeks.

Published results by month, August 2025 – July 2026

Published results by month, August 2025 – July 2026
Month	Weeks reported	Net points	Highlight
Aug 2025	1	+1,680	First documented week: 21 wins vs 3 losses at 87.5%
Sep 2025	3	+8,390	A perfect 100% week (+3,420 points, zero losses)
Oct 2025	4	+16,346	Late-October stretch: +7,431 points at 95.9%
Nov 2025	1	+6,770	+6,770 points in ten days at roughly 92%
Dec 2025	2	+6,770	95% accuracy through the year-transition week
Jan 2026	3	+22,605	Closed the month with a 98.5% week worth +10,505 points
Feb 2026	2	+20,985	Strongest week on record: +15,960 points at 97.5%
Mar 2026	2	+13,710	+7,010 points across 33 calls at 95.9%
Apr 2026	2	+9,740	A second perfect 100% week (+5,695 points)
Jun 2026	4	+22,575	Four straight positive weeks between 89.5% and 97.3%
Jul 2026	1	+5,510	+5,510 points at 92.9% to open the month

How the results are verified

Every call is timestamped in the Telegram feed at the moment it is issued, with entry, take-profit and stop-loss fixed before publication. Trades close at the published levels, and the weekly report tallies the points arithmetic in the open. Recent closed calls are listed on the trading calls page, the weekly summaries are explained in the weekly signals results guide, and the production process is documented in our methodology.

Read this before you extrapolate

An honest record needs honest caveats. Past performance does not guarantee future results — a 94% historical average is a description of what happened, not a promise of what will. Your own outcome in rupee terms depends on your position sizing, spreads, execution timing and discipline, so identical calls produce different results for different traders. Trading leveraged products can lose you your entire deposit, offshore brokers are not SEBI-regulated, and you should never trade money you cannot afford to lose — see the risk disclosure.

Frequently asked questions

Because trade-count win rates hide risk: many small wins can mask one account-breaking loss. Points-based accuracy weighs each result by the size of the move, so it cannot be inflated by cutting winners short and letting losers run.

The standard price-move unit for each instrument, as used consistently in the weekly reports — for example whole dollar moves in gold or index points in the Nasdaq. Net points are total points won minus total points lost in the period.

No — the record is kept in points because points are currency-independent and measure the quality of the calls themselves. What a point is worth in rupees depends entirely on your own lot size and account, so two traders following the same calls earn different amounts.

Every published week closed net-positive, with weekly accuracy ranging from 86.7% to 100%. Losing trades happen in almost every week — they are simply capped by stop-losses and outweighed by the winners. Weeks without a full published report are excluded from the record, not estimated.

Yes. Calls are timestamped in Telegram when issued, and weekly summaries are published with the points arithmetic. Join the feed via the get started page and audit it in real time — that is precisely what we would suggest doing with any provider.

Yes. Both the weekly accuracy and the net points figures are calculated after all losing and break-even trades. Nothing is edited out of the record.

Ready to start?

Save up to $2,500/yr

Get the trading calls free

Open a trading account with Base Markets through our link and deposit $400 (roughly ₹35,000) — the capital stays in your own account, yours to trade — and you unlock every call free, replacing a subscription worth around $2,500/yr.

1Open a Base Markets account through our link
2Deposit $400 — the capital stays yours to trade
3Send your proof on Telegram and get every call free

Open a Base Markets account

Prefer to just subscribe?

No broker account needed — subscribe through our Telegram bot and start receiving every call with a clear entry, take-profit and stop-loss, straight to your phone.

Subscribe on Telegram

Forex and CFD trading carries a substantial risk of loss; offshore brokers are not SEBI-regulated, and our calls are market analysis and education, not investment advice.

Trading forex, CFDs and crypto carries a substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for every trader — offshore brokers are not regulated by SEBI, our calls are analyst opinions and education rather than investment advice, and past performance does not guarantee future results.

Last updated 6 July 2026