See the verified track record

Our performance — every week, published

This page is the record most signal providers never show you. Since August 2025 the desk has published its results every week — wins, losses and break-evens included — and measured accuracy the strict way: by points, not by trade count. The same record backs the paid Telegram subscription for traders in Singapore.

At a glance

Best Trading Signal has published weekly signal results since August 2025: a 93% average weekly accuracy measured by points and +197,891 net points across 37 reported weeks through July 2026. Accuracy is calculated from points won versus points lost — not by counting winning trades — and every figure traces back to timestamped Telegram signals with entry, take profit and stop loss.

93% average weekly accuracy — measured by points, not trade count
+197,891 net points over 37 published weeks (Aug 2025 – Aug 2026)
Best week on record: +15,960 points at 97.5% (2–6 Feb 2026)
Two perfect 100% weeks (1–5 Sep 2025 and 20–24 Apr 2026)
Lowest published weekly accuracy: 86.7% — losses happen, stops cap them

93%

Accuracy (by points)

Published weekly reports

+197,891

Net points

August 2025 – September 2026

Weeks

August 2025 – September 2026

Accuracy (by points)

August 2025 – September 2026

100%75%50%25%0%

25–29 Aug 2025Accuracy (by points) 87.5% · +1,680 Net points1–5 Sep 2025Accuracy (by points) 100% · +3,420 Net points15–19 Sep 2025Accuracy (by points) 93% · +3,065 Net points22–26 Sep 2025Accuracy (by points) 90% · +1,905 Net points29 Sep – 3 Oct 2025Accuracy (by points) 86.7% · +2,365 Net points6–10 Oct 2025Accuracy (by points) 87% · +3,416 Net points13–17 Oct 2025Accuracy (by points) 93.2% · +3,134 Net points20–31 Oct 2025Accuracy (by points) 95.9% · +7,431 Net points1–10 Nov 2025Accuracy (by points) 92% · +6,770 Net points15–19 Dec 2025Accuracy (by points) 90% · +2,780 Net points29 Dec – 2 Jan 2026Accuracy (by points) 95% · +3,990 Net points12–16 Jan 2026Accuracy (by points) 96.5% · +5,360 Net points19–23 Jan 2026Accuracy (by points) 96% · +6,740 Net points26–30 Jan 2026Accuracy (by points) 98.5% · +10,505 Net points2–6 Feb 2026Accuracy (by points) 97.5% · +15,960 Net points23–27 Feb 2026Accuracy (by points) 93% · +5,025 Net points9–13 Mar 2026Accuracy (by points) 96% · +6,700 Net points16–20 Mar 2026Accuracy (by points) 95.9% · +7,010 Net points13–17 Apr 2026Accuracy (by points) 95.5% · +4,045 Net points20–24 Apr 2026Accuracy (by points) 100% · +5,695 Net points1–5 Jun 2026Accuracy (by points) 96.2% · +5,705 Net points8–12 Jun 2026Accuracy (by points) 89.5% · +4,385 Net points15–19 Jun 2026Accuracy (by points) 90.7% · +5,245 Net points22–26 Jun 2026Accuracy (by points) 97.3% · +7,240 Net points29 Jun – 3 Jul 2026Accuracy (by points) 92.9% · +5,510 Net points6 – 10 Jul 2026Accuracy (by points) 94.9% · +5,425 Net points13 – 17 Jul 2026Accuracy (by points) 97.5% · +6,930 Net points20 – 24 Jul 2026Accuracy (by points) 91.1% · +4,705 Net points27 – 31 Jul 2026Accuracy (by points) 93.1% · +4,425 Net points3 – 7 Aug 2026Accuracy (by points) 83.9% · +2,770 Net points10 – 14 Aug 2026Accuracy (by points) 95% · +4,480 Net points17 – 21 Aug 2026Accuracy (by points) 91.4% · +4,350 Net points24 – 28 Aug 2026Accuracy (by points) 96.35% · +6,350 Net points31 Aug – 4 Sep 2026Accuracy (by points) 91.34% · +6,875 Net points7 – 11 Sep 2026Accuracy (by points) 88.9% · +5,435 Net points14 – 18 Sep 2026Accuracy (by points) 97.99% · +6,685 Net points21 – 25 Sep 2026Accuracy (by points) 85.55% · +4,380 Net points

AugOctNovFebAprJulAugSep

See the verified track record

Week	Accuracy (by points)	Net points	At a glance
21 – 25 Sep 2026September	85.55%	+4,380	+4,380 net points at an 85.55% success rate (by points) across 38 signals on gold, indices, oil and forex for the week of 21–25 September 2026 — 23 wins, 8 losses and 7 break-even. Gold contributed +1,285 net over 12 trades, including a single +400 run, the S&P 500 added +1,350 from three signals and the Nasdaq +920 from two (one +600 run).
14 – 18 Sep 2026September	97.99%	+6,685	+6,685 net points at a 97.99% success rate (by points) across 38 signals on gold, indices, oil and forex for the week of 14–18 September 2026 — 34 wins, 2 losses and 2 break-even. Gold contributed +3,365 net over 12 winning trades, including a single +560 run, US oil added +1,100 from two signals (one +800 run) and the S&P 500 +700 from two.
7 – 11 Sep 2026September	88.9%	+5,435	+5,435 net points at an 88.9% success rate (by points) across 39 signals on gold, indices, forex and oil for the week of 7–11 September 2026 — 30 wins, 6 losses and 3 break-even. Gold contributed +3,085 net over 16 trades, including a single +550 run, the Dow Jones added +920 from two signals and the S&P 500 +850 from two.
31 Aug – 4 Sep 2026September	91.34%	+6,875	+6,875 net points at a 91.34% success rate (by points) across 37 signals on gold, indices, oil and forex for the week of 31 August – 4 September 2026 — 32 wins, 5 losses. Gold contributed +2,980 net over 15 trades, and a single Dow Jones call added +700.
24 – 28 Aug 2026August	96.35%	+6,350	+6,350 net points at a 96.35% success rate (by points) across 34 signals on gold, indices, oil, forex and crypto for the week of 24–28 August 2026 — 29 wins, 2 losses and 3 break-even. Gold was the standout: 11 trades for +4,595 net, including a single +1,250 run.
17 – 21 Aug 2026August	91.4%	+4,350	+4,350 net points at a 91.4% success rate (by points) across 36 signals on gold, indices, oil, forex and crypto for the week of 17–21 August 2026 — 27 wins, 4 losses and 5 break-even. Gold carried the week again with 11 trades for +1,800 net, including a single +950 run, against two losing gold trades. The S&P 500 added +950 from two signals and US oil +820 from three.
10 – 14 Aug 2026August	95%	+4,480	+4,480 net points at a 95% success rate (by points) across 34 signals on gold, indices, forex and crypto for the week of 10–14 August 2026 — 26 wins, 3 losses and 5 break-even. Gold alone contributed +2,625 net over 9 trades, including a single +870 run.
3 – 7 Aug 2026August	83.9%	+2,770	+2,770 net points at an 83.9% success rate (by points) across 30 signals on gold, indices, forex and crypto for the week of 3–7 August 2026 — 22 wins, 7 losses and 1 break-even. Gold alone contributed +2,380 net over 14 trades, including a single +800 run, against 4 losing gold trades.
27 – 31 Jul 2026July	93.1%	+4,425	+4,425 net points at a 93.1% success rate (by points) across 29 signals on gold, indices, forex, oil and crypto for the week of 27–31 July 2026 — 23 wins, 4 losses and 2 break-even. Gold alone contributed +2,890 net over 13 trades.
20 – 24 Jul 2026July	91.1%	+4,705	+4,705 net points at a 91.1% success rate (by points) across 44 signals on gold, indices, oil, forex and crypto for the week of 20–24 July 2026. Gold alone contributed +2,200 net over 15 trades.
13 – 17 Jul 2026July	97.5%	+6,930	+6,930 net points at a 97.5% success rate (by points) on gold, indices, oil, forex and crypto for the week of 13–17 July 2026.
6 – 10 Jul 2026July	94.9%	+5,425	+5,425 net points at a 94.9% success rate (by points) on gold, indices, oil, forex and crypto — 22 winning trades against 3 losses and 6 break-even.
29 Jun – 3 Jul 2026July	92.9%	+5,510	+5,510 net points at a 92.9% success rate (by points) on gold, indices, forex, oil and crypto — 22 winning trades against 3 losses and 6 break-even.
22–26 Jun 2026June	97.3%	+7,240	+7,240 net points at a 97.3% success rate (by points) on gold, indices, forex and crypto — 22 winning trades against 3 losses and 4 break-even.
15–19 Jun 2026June	90.7%	+5,245	+5,245 net points at a 90.7% success rate (by points) on gold, indices, forex, oil and crypto — 21 winning trades against 5 losses and 7 break-even.
8–12 Jun 2026June	89.5%	+4,385	+4,385 net points across 13 instruments at an 89.5% success rate — 33 winning trades against 4 losses and one break-even.
1–5 Jun 2026June	96.2%	+5,705	+5,705 net points at a 96.2% success rate on gold, forex and indices.
20–24 Apr 2026April	100%	+5,695	A perfect week: 100% success rate and +5,695 net points with not a single losing trade.
13–17 Apr 2026April	95.5%	+4,045	95.5% success rate and +4,045 net points on gold and forex signals.
16–20 Mar 2026March	95.9%	+7,010	+7,010 net points at a 95.9% success rate across 33 signals, led by gold, Ethereum and oil.
9–13 Mar 2026March	96%	+6,700	A 96% win rate and more than +6,700 points on gold, oil and Nasdaq.
23–27 Feb 2026February	93%	+5,025	A success rate close to 93% and more than +5,025 net points on gold, forex and indices.
2–6 Feb 2026February	97.5%	+15,960	A record: +15,960 points in a single week at a 97.5% success rate — the strongest week on record, on gold and indices.
26–30 Jan 2026January	98.5%	+10,505	An exceptional week: 98.5% success rate and more than +10,505 net points across the full range of instruments.
19–23 Jan 2026January	96%	+6,740	+6,740 net points at a 96% success rate across gold, indices and oil.
12–16 Jan 2026January	96.5%	+5,360	A high 96.5% success rate and +5,360 net points — a standout performance for gold and forex signals.
29 Dec – 2 Jan 2026December	95%	+3,990	The year-transition week: 95% success rate and +3,990 net points on gold and indices.
15–19 Dec 2025December	90%	+2,780	+2,780 net points at a 90% success rate on gold and forex signals heading into year-end.
1–10 Nov 2025November	92%	+6,770	November opened with more than +6,770 points of profit in ten days at a success rate close to 92%.
20–31 Oct 2025October	95.9%	+7,431	An extended late-October stretch delivering +7,431 net points at a 95.9% success rate on gold, indices and oil.
13–17 Oct 2025October	93.2%	+3,134	93.2% success rate and +3,134 net points — a strong week for gold and forex signals.
6–10 Oct 2025October	87%	+3,416	+3,416 net points at a success rate of around 87% across gold, index and oil signals.
29 Sep – 3 Oct 2025October	86.7%	+2,365	+2,365 net points at an 86.7% success rate on gold and forex despite the volatility of early October.
22–26 Sep 2025September	90%	+1,905	A steady week at a 90% success rate and +1,905 net points with strict risk management and a stop-loss on every trade.
15–19 Sep 2025September	93%	+3,065	93% success rate and +3,065 net points spread across gold, forex and index signals.
1–5 Sep 2025September	100%	+3,420	A perfect week: 100% success rate and +3,420 net points across 13 winning trades with zero losses, led by Bitcoin, Nasdaq and gold.
25–29 Aug 2025August	87.5%	+1,680	First documented week in the record: 21 winning trades against 3 losses and +1,680 net points on gold, silver and forex at an 87.5% success rate.

How we measure accuracy — by points, not trade count

Most providers advertise a win rate by trade count: ten small winners and two large losers reads as "83% accurate" even if the account lost money. We refuse that arithmetic. Our weekly accuracy is calculated by points: the points gained on winning signals measured against the points lost on losing ones. One big loss weighs exactly as much as it should.

A point is the standard price-move unit for each instrument as reported in the weekly summaries — so the measure works identically across gold, forex pairs, indices, oil and crypto. Net points for a week is simply everything won minus everything lost.

The record at a glance

37 published weeks between 25 August 2025 and 3 July 2026
93% average weekly accuracy by points (unweighted average of the weekly rates)
+197,891 net points in total, after all losses and break-evens
Weekly accuracy ranged from 86.7% to 100% — no published week closed net-negative
Coverage: gold, silver, forex majors, Nasdaq, S&P, Dow, DAX, oil, Bitcoin and Ethereum

Month by month

Every row below comes from the published weekly reports. Weeks in which no full report was issued are excluded from the record entirely rather than estimated — which is why some months show fewer reported weeks than calendar weeks.

Published results by month, August 2025 – August 2026

Published results by month, August 2025 – August 2026
Month	Weeks reported	Net points	Highlight
Aug 2025	1	+197,891	First documented week: 21 wins vs 3 losses at 87.5%
Sep 2025	3	+8,390	A perfect 100% week (+3,420 points, zero losses)
Oct 2025	4	+16,346	Late-October stretch: +7,431 points at 95.9%
Nov 2025	1	+6,770	+6,770 points in ten days at roughly 92%
Dec 2025	2	+6,770	95% accuracy through the year-transition week
Jan 2026	3	+22,605	Closed the month with a 98.5% week worth +10,505 points
Feb 2026	2	+20,985	Strongest week on record: +15,960 points at 97.5%
Mar 2026	2	+13,710	+7,010 points across 33 signals at 95.9%
Apr 2026	2	+9,740	A second perfect 100% week (+5,695 points)
Jun 2026	4	+22,575	Four straight positive weeks between 89.5% and 97.3%
Jul 2026	1	+5,510	+5,510 points at 92.9% to open the month

How the results are verified

Every signal is timestamped in the Telegram feed at the moment it is issued, with entry, take profit and stop loss fixed before publication. Trades close at the published levels, and the weekly report tallies the points arithmetic in the open. Recent closed signals are listed on the signals page, the weekly summaries are explained in the weekly signals results guide, and the production process is documented in our methodology.

Read this before you extrapolate

An honest record needs honest caveats. Past performance does not guarantee future results — a 93% historical average is a description of what happened, not a promise of what will. Your own outcome in S$ terms depends on your position sizing, spreads, execution timing, the USD/SGD rate and your discipline, so identical signals produce different results for different traders. Leveraged CFD trading loses money for the majority of retail accounts at every broker that publishes a figure, and you can lose your entire deposit; never trade money you cannot afford to lose.

Frequently asked questions

Because trade-count win rates hide risk: many small wins can mask one account-breaking loss. Points-based accuracy weighs each result by the size of the move, so it cannot be inflated by cutting winners short and letting losers run.

The standard price-move unit for each instrument, as used consistently in the weekly reports — for example whole dollar moves in gold or index points in the Nasdaq. Net points are total points won minus total points lost in the period.

Every published week closed net-positive, with weekly accuracy ranging from 86.7% to 100%. Losing trades happen in almost every week — they are simply capped by stop losses and outweighed by the winners. Weeks without a full published report are excluded from the record, not estimated.

Yes. Signals are timestamped in Telegram when issued, and weekly summaries are published with the points arithmetic. Join the feed via the start page and audit it in real time — that is precisely what we would suggest doing with any provider.

Yes. Both the weekly accuracy and the net points figures are calculated after all losing and break-even trades. Nothing is edited out of the record.

Ready to start?

Our trading signals are a separate service run by Best Trading Signal. They are not affiliated with, provided by or endorsed by any broker.

Subscribe to the signals

Subscribe through our Telegram bot and receive every signal with a clear entry, take-profit and stop-loss. No broker account is required: you can follow the signals with any regulated broker, including a MAS-licensed firm.

Subscribe on Telegram

Need a broker?

Our top-ranked broker is Pepperstone: authorised by seven regulators, including ASIC, the FCA and CySEC, with spreads from 0.0 pips on the Razor account. Opening a broker account is optional and separate from the signals subscription.

Open a Pepperstone account

Risk warning (Pepperstone, Jul–Sep 2026): 72.9% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider under FCA and CySEC, 75.2% under BaFin, 79.6% under SCB and 75–95% under CMA. The figure depends on the licensed entity your account is opened with. Make sure you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford the high risk of losing your money.

Trading forex and CFDs involves substantial risk of loss. Singapore's capital markets are regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS); the offshore brokers most retail CFD traders use are not MAS-licensed, and our signals are analyst opinions, not investment advice.

Trading forex, CFDs and crypto carries a substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for every investor. In Singapore, capital markets services are licensed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) — the brokers ranked on this site are licensed offshore and are not MAS-licensed, so you trade outside Singapore's investor-protection framework. Our signals are analyst opinions, not guaranteed profits, and past performance does not guarantee future results.

Last updated 28 September 2026